interesting take on the proceedings derek. now that you have brought up my publishing record (which has nothing to do with the current hilarity) i will correct a couple of your most wilfully ignorant gaffes.
first, i published nz windsurfer for 3 years (these are actual years - not like the 6 years steve claims to have published W&K). each year I delivered three quality magazines totally dedicated to local content. each was delivered on time, on budget and every single issue was sold for real money - no giveaways! each issue was run as a business in its own right and was profitable - no debt carried whatsoever!
the magazine was known internationally as one of the best at representing the sport, despite the limited size of the readership. new zealand windsurfer didn't fail - it was profitable and growing at a rate of 15% per quarter. in 1999, i started getting into kiting and was perfectly happy to keep publishing the mag even though i personally was no longer interested in the sport. you will recall how far guys like you had your heads up your nether regions at the time and how unpopular anyone was who switched to the new sport. i myself had had a very good run at windsurfing already, had given it everything but inevitably, had more than a gutsful of dealing with many aspects of the 'windsurf industry'. i chose to put my energies into the superior sport of kiting which i was convinced was the future.
that's when i started cranking out a kiting magazine, despite being able to count the new zealand kiting population on my fingers and toes. i started kitesurf quarterly small but due to its winning formula of actual information, humour and penetrating analysis it went BIG! that baby grew at a rate of 60% per quarter until it was selling over 2500 copies per issue in New Zealand and Australia - no giveaways - and this was almost five years ago when kiters were far thinner on the water than today.
you admit you never read KSQ which shows how long it took you to see the wood for the trees and start kiting a couple of years ago. steve never read it either. funny that you've both had a lot to say about it over the years, and apparently share the same misconceptions and bad attitudes about it.
my kiting mag did not fail in any way either. i decided to suspend publication of it, while it was very much in the black and growing at a phenomenal rate - a decision that was a lot more to do with external events than most people appreciate. i don't regret my choice, except occasionally when i read the garbage other people have published in the name of our sport.
the greatest success of both my mags is even now, years later, people still read them, learn from them, talk about them and generally recall their existence. only time will tell how people remember steve dickinson's hit and run style, or the illiterate bilge that he spawned.
nevertheless, the whole thing is a bit of a giggle. best of all, you and i actually get to go kiting from time to time, which is one of the best things anyone can do on the planet. i can only imagine the pitiful existence of tweakers like steve who have had to deal with the entire saga without a moment of clarity while soaring over a sandbar, or the never failing joy of planing into a wave.
i can imagine how it hurts to be called failures, fly-by-nighters and clueless losers etc but at the end of the day steve has apparently not failed, if he has actually unloaded his dead dog to someone for hard cash! good on him, he has won the prize...and good on you derek for giving it a bash.
aloha to all wind warriors and seekers of the truth!