Dear Sir/Madam
I would just like to congratulate you on the highly balanced and factual report that Kathy Marks did on the Godwits of Ruakaka
Just to set the facts straight:
1. Godwits fly from New Zealand to their breeding grounds in our Autumn not the Spring.
2. The 11000km Journey the Godwits undertake is actually from Alaska to New Zealand in September. The return journey in March is a much more sedate affair with multiple stops along the way. This ensures they arrive in Alaska in good condition to breed
3. Since they breed in Alaska I find it strange it was reported that”I’ve seen nests abandoned and eggs left to die"
I have Kiteboarded at various spots in Bream Bay and know the locals, you couldn’t meet a nicer bunch of environmentally friendly people.
It seems unfair to blame all of the problems on Kiteboarders. This form DOC’s own studies
www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science...echnical/drds204.pdf
The amount of human disturbance at the three sites varies. Ruakaka has the
highest level of disturbance, with residential properties adjoining the refuge on
the south side of the river, and a campground on the western edge. The
campground has c. 10 000 visitors over the summer holiday period (G.
Acethorp, pers. comm.) and the level of disturbance is high, with people using
the refuge for recreational activities and beach access. Generally, the beach and
refuge are used during most of the daylight hours over summer with the peak
from mid-morning to the evening (KH, pers. obs.).
Waipu has a lower level of disturbance, with only about a dozen residences
The programme is most visible at Ruakaka owing to the high visitor use, and a
very high level of disturbance from people, along with dogs and cats, is seen at
this site. A high level of advocacy is also undertaken here. The programme, as a
result, may be achieving substantial advocacy benefits for shorebirds above the
real benefits of protection, or it may be that the protection measures, fencing
for instance, are giving a false sense of comfort to the people using the site
without providing actual benefits for the shorebirds.
At Ruakaka, several areas require investigation. Public attitudes to and
It also seems DOC and the local Kiteboarders already have systems in place to monitor any ongoing affects of the general public to wildlife in the refuge. Unlike some of the self appointed local volunteers with their own agendas to push.
www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/news/media-rel...kaka-wildlife-refuge
Google returned these results in 0.19 seconds, not that long really to do a little research.
Regards
Mark Bennett